Introduction
Globalization was perceived as an irresistible power over the course of decades, something that is integrating the markets, faster than ever, and connecting societies together by means of capital, information, and culture flows. However, in recent years there has been a discernible backlash to this in the form of deglobalization in the world. The debates have been increased by geopolitical tensions, vulnerabilities in the supply chains and the emergence of economic nationalism on whether the world is moving into a new phase where globalization is in recession or reorganizing itself.
The central question is no longer whether globalization is “good” or “bad,” but where it is going next.
What Is Driving Deglobalization?
- Geopolitical Rivalries
The U.S.–China strategic competition has reconfigured global trade and technology flows. Export controls, sanctions, and restrictions on investment into sensitive sectors are fragmenting what was once a tightly interconnected global economic system.
- Supply Chain Reconfiguration
The COVID-19 pandemic exposed the fragility of global supply chains. Companies and governments have since accelerated efforts to:
- “Reshore” production back home
- “Nearshore” to neighboring countries
- “Friend-shore” in ideologically aligned states
This shift is less about abandoning global trade and more about risk management.
- Rise of Protectionism
Many countries are boosting domestic industries through tariffs, industrial policies, and subsidies. The U.S. CHIPS Act, EU Green Deal Industrial Plan, and India’s Production-Linked Incentive (PLI) schemes all point to a world where states actively shape economic outcomes, sometimes at the cost of global competition.
- Technology Balkanization
Instead of a single integrated digital ecosystem, we see competing technological spheres:
- Different standards (5G, semiconductors, AI governance)
- Fragmentation of data regulations
- Competing platforms and ecosystems
This “techno-splintering” deepens economic divides.
Why Globalization Is Not Disappearing
Despite signs of fragmentation, globalization is not reversing—it is evolving. Several forces continue to push the world toward deeper interdependence.
- Services Globalization Is Booming
While goods trade shows strain, services—especially digital services—are expanding rapidly:
- Remote work
- Cloud computing
- Cross-border software exports
- Digital platforms
This is a form of globalization that is less visible but more resilient.
- Developing Countries Are Becoming New Growth Hubs
Countries like India, Vietnam, Indonesia, Mexico, and several African nations are emerging as critical nodes in global supply chains. Rather than retreating, production networks are rebalancing.
- Climate and Energy Transitions Need Global Cooperation
From carbon markets to green technology transfer, no country can meet climate goals alone. The energy transition inherently demands:
- Multinational financing
- Cross-border mineral supply chains (lithium, cobalt, nickel)
- Shared research and innovation
This increases global interdependence.
- People, Culture, and Information Move Faster Than Ever
Social media, streaming platforms, and global communication systems ensure that cultural globalization continues regardless of political choices.
So Are We Globalizing or Deglobalizing?
The answer: both—depending on the domain.
We’re seeing Deglobalization in:
- Strategic industries (semiconductors, defense, pharmaceuticals)
- Energy security
- High-tech supply chains
- Investment screening and trade controls
We’re seeing Re-Globalization in:
- Digital services
- Climate and energy cooperation
- Emerging-market manufacturing
- Cross-border talent flows
- Global finance and capital markets
The world is shifting from hyper-globalization (1990–2010) toward a “multipolar globalization” characterized by:
- Regional blocs
- Multiple centers of economic power
- Redundant supply chains
- More political oversight of trade
Where Are We Headed? Five Possible Trajectories
- Multipolar Globalization (Most Likely)
A world with several major economic hubs—U.S., China, EU, India—interlinked but competing.
Outcome: Fragmented but interconnected globalization.
- Selective Deglobalization
Governments continue to decouple only in sensitive sectors while global integration grows elsewhere.
Outcome: Dual-track world: secure goods vs. free-flowing services.
- Regionalization of Trade
Asia, Europe, and the Americas become more internally integrated.
Outcome: Supply chains become local-regional, not global.
- Digital-First Globalization
Data, AI, software, and online work overshadow traditional goods-based trade.
Outcome: A fully globalized digital economy with localized manufacturing.
- Hard Decoupling (Least Likely but High Impact)
A world split into rival economic and technological blocs.
Outcome: High costs, slower growth, and major geopolitical tensions.
Conclusion
Globalization is not dead–it is changing. The period of frictionless efficiency-based globalization is being replaced with a more strategic, diversified and politically disputed globalization. Countries and companies should learn to live in this new hybrid world, where international links can be made with national concerns and territorial limitations.
The issue is not, is globalization going to persist, but what kind of form it is going to assume. And the reply to this is becoming more obvious: it is a connected, yet non-united world; competitive, yet interdependent; global, but no longer borderless.
Disclaimer: The information and analysis provided in this article are for general informational purposes only and do not constitute professional, financial, policy, or legal advice. While every effort has been made to ensure accuracy and relevance, global economic and geopolitical conditions can change rapidly, and interpretations may vary. The views expressed are those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the positions of any institution, employer, or organization. Readers should conduct their own research or consult qualified professionals before making decisions based on the content of this article.
